• Re: Upstate brainwashees

    From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Lee Lofaso on Sun Sep 29 16:47:32 2024
    It all started with the fly. Live and on camera, President Obama
    showed the world what to do when a fly lands on your arm. Use your
    hand on your other arm and swat it. One swat and that fly was dead.

    With Pence it was an entirely different matter. We all watched
    the debate, when a fly landed on top of Pence's head. The fly was
    the star of the show, dancing around for all to see. And what did
    Pence do? He just stood there. Staring at the camera. Without a
    single thought in his head as to what to do.

    Obama made a pact with the devil, but that doesn't mean that he's a reptilian.

    Pence is a reptilian. He can't overreact to a fly on his face because that will scare the prey away.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Mon Sep 30 10:47:00 2024
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/23/senate-democrats-
    ation-border-bill

    I'm sorry, but even after reading this article, I still don't see any proof that Trump had anything to do with the bill being killed.

    "At the behest of Trump.." <- That doesn't mean anything to me. Is there any video evidence? The article doesn't say "Trump was in the room" or "Trump gave
    a big thumbs-down to house members."

    Him bad mouthing and suggesting the GOP vote against the bill was all over
    the news. It is not my fault if you don't watch it.

    It is better than what we have. Funny how the same people who complain about executive orders one minute are the same ones saying "he can already do that (with an executive order)" the next.

    Yea, all we can expect and hope for is for Trump to get elected so he can protect us from illegal immigrants for 4 more years. The senate doesn't want the mess cleaned up - just look at what's in that bill. That bill was going to
    legitimize thousands of illegal crossings per day, which would make things difficult for a president who wants to "deport all illegals."

    It didn't legitimize illegal crossings. It allowed for a cap on crossings
    at legal border crossings. The bill would have been a lot better than what we have now and didn't do anything to stop Republicans from passing something
    even more strict once Trump got into office.

    Seeing how liberal Democrats voted against it because it was "too strict"
    tells me it was not a bad bill.

    Since February, when the bill was killed, every single illegal that has got into the country is equally on the heads of Trump, Johnson, and all of their cronnies as is is on the head of Biden. It stopped being the "Biden border crisis" at that point.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Sir! Romulan Warbird decloaking off th #%NO CARRIER
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to Aaron Thomas on Mon Sep 30 20:20:27 2024
    Hello Aaron,

    I do not believe he, or Kamala, are "chosen by God."

    Obama is The Chosen One.

    Beliefs like that when it comes to someone in politics MP>will get you in
    a lot of trouble.

    It worked for Obama. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize.
    Before taking office. If that doesn't tell you something,
    I do not know what does.

    Relying on a candidate being chosen by God would be a mistake, because we've
    got to do a lot more than just chant slogans.

    Hope and Change. Together. What does it spell? Freedom.

    Praying for Trump's victory is the way to go.

    Hillary Cllinton beat him by over 3 million votes in 2016.
    Joe Biden beat him by over 7 million votes in 2020.
    Kamala Harris will clock him by an even greater score in 2024.

    I do it every day, sometimes twice a day.

    All the prayers in the world will come to naught as the
    American people have the last and final say.

    For Life,
    Lee

    --
    The first thing a cult does is claim that everyone else is lying to you.

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Mon Sep 30 14:57:46 2024
    I'm sorry, but even after reading this article, I still don't see any pr that Trump had anything to do with the bill being killed.

    "At the behest of Trump.." <- That doesn't mean anything to me. Is there video evidence? The article doesn't say "Trump was in the room" or "Trum gave
    a big thumbs-down to house members."

    Him bad mouthing and suggesting the GOP vote against the bill was all
    over the news. It is not my fault if you don't watch it.

    The news isn't a communications device for the president and congress. I don't believe that Trump forced his opinion on anybody. And if he did, then there would have to be more to that story, like what violent thing did he threaten to do to Mike Johnson if the legislation had passed? "You better listen to me boy." lol

    It didn't legitimize illegal crossings. It allowed for a cap on
    crossings at legal border crossings. The bill would have been a lot better than what we have now and didn't do anything to stop Republicans from passing something even more strict once Trump got into office.

    The way I remember reading it was "a cap on ILLEGAL border crossings."

    Why would we cap the legal crossings? That would not make sense, and would not be productive.

    Seeing how liberal Democrats voted against it because it was "too strict" tells me it was not a bad bill.

    Not bad for us but bad for them, and that's ultimately bad for us too because we need a few of their votes.

    Since February, when the bill was killed, every single illegal that has got into the country is equally on the heads of Trump, Johnson, and all
    of their cronnies as is is on the head of Biden. It stopped being the "Biden border crisis" at that point.

    I just don't see the Trump pressure.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Lee Lofaso on Mon Sep 30 15:04:56 2024
    I do it every day, sometimes twice a day.

    All the prayers in the world will come to naught as the
    American people have the last and final say.

    Maybe some people need 4 more years of destruction. Maybe the Democrats are doing that good of a job hiding everything from them.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Randall Schad@1:226/44 to Aaron Thomas on Mon Sep 30 17:45:47 2024
    On 28 Sep 2024, Aaron Thomas said the following...

    That's not what I hear, though. I hear "she should have done all the things already that she's promising to do now."

    That's what Trump said about her. I'm just saying that she's guilty by association.

    There are answers to certain questions that can be inferred:

    Q: Why did Joe let in more than 20 million migrants without visas?
    A: Because it will create more house seats that only Democrats can fill.

    I still don't know where that 20 million number comes from. It certainly isn't an accurate representation of the immigrant population. The total immigrant population (all nationalities, including illegals) is somewhere around 47-48 million, and it was 45 million under Trump. That's a net gain of 3 million people over 4 years.

    I did see a Pew research number somewhere that said the total illegal population was something like 11 million. That did not happen in 4 years.

    The immigration/fentanyl/criminal/rapist/insanity issue as a whole is complete rubbish. I can't believe there are people with the ability to think critically that get roped into making it an issue of primary concern.

    Q: Is Kamala a Democrat, like Joe?
    A: Yes.

    Do you also have two arms and two legs, just like Joe?

    Certainly that's a source of unending consternation.

    Q: Does Trump control congress?
    A: No.

    Interestingly enough, he did have enough pull to get congress to vote down an immigration bill that both sides liked, seemingly because he needed the immigration platform for his campaign. So maybe that's not as true as we'd like.

    Q: If Trump IS controlling congress, what are Democrats doing about it? A: Nothing.

    On THIS point, I'm in 100% agreement. Democrats have done embarrassingly little to solve much of anything in quite a while.

    Again, not defending Harris. I'm saying on a lot of this stuff, there's nothing to defend. The primary role of the VP is not to pass legislation. It's all just diversionary garbage.

    RS

    ... Every plastic toy dinosaur is made from real dinosaurs.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Arena BBS ú netasylum.com:2323 (1:226/44)
  • From Randall Schad@1:226/44 to Mike Powell on Mon Sep 30 18:03:13 2024
    I do remember a lot of non-supporters blaming Cheney for things that happened while Bush was President, and IIRC Gore also tried taking credit for some things that happened while Clinton was President.

    To a far lesser degree, I agree. I think my original statement (or intent, at least) was to say that I've never seen it this pronounced.

    Harris has most certainly been trying to take credit for things she
    thinks are good, while distancing herself from things she thinks have
    not turned out good, that resulted from Biden's Presidency.

    I admittedly have not been paying very close attention to her campaign, so I don't recall what those wins are that she's sharing credit for. (That's also partly because I don't think the administration really had any big wins in the first place.)

    (2) we now have his VP (who is the new candidate) showing up at places and events where you would normally expect to be seeing the President.

    That's fair. And I believe it was Aaron who made a "guilt by association" claim that, if using more of this foundation, would have scored with me.

    If you accept credit, even if it is something you didn't really accomplish yourself, you open yourself up for blame, too.

    Very fair assessment. After this conversation, I'll definitely be paying more attention to things like that.

    RS

    ... The secret of getting ahead is mastering the guillotine.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Arena BBS ú netasylum.com:2323 (1:226/44)
  • From Randall Schad@1:226/44 to Aaron Thomas on Mon Sep 30 18:41:26 2024
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/23/senate-democr ation-border-bill

    I'm sorry, but even after reading this article, I still don't see any proof that Trump had anything to do with the bill being killed.

    "At the behest of Trump.." <- That doesn't mean anything to me. Is there any video evidence? The article doesn't say "Trump was in the room" or "Trump gave a big thumbs-down to house members."

    Trump, at the time, was very vocal about taking credit for the bill failing. I do recall reading an article then where it named specific people and phone calls made, but my Google-fu is weak today.

    He's got quotes as far back as January saying he would fight the bill all
    the way, and no bill was better than a bad bill.

    Perhaps he didn't have full control over the MAGA congress, but to say that he had no influence is disingenuous.

    RS

    ... "Road work ahead" ... I sure hope it does!

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Arena BBS ú netasylum.com:2323 (1:226/44)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Randall Schad on Mon Sep 30 19:38:08 2024
    Q: Why did Joe let in more than 20 million migrants without visas?
    A: Because it will create more house seats that only Democrats can fi

    I still don't know where that 20 million number comes from. It certainly isn't an accurate representation of the immigrant population. The total immigrant population (all nationalities, including illegals) is
    somewhere around 47-48 million, and it was 45 million under Trump.
    That's a net gain of 3 million people over 4 years.

    I'm talking about undocumented migrants; people without background checks. Not "immigrants." I don't know where the numbers come from either, but they are often reported by the media and they range from 7 to 20 million, while Trump has suggested that Biden may have let in closer to 40 million undocumented migrants.

    Also, this isn't about an "immigrant population," this is about the number of foreigners who entered the USA without a visa while Biden was president.

    I did see a Pew research number somewhere that said the total illegal population was something like 11 million. That did not happen in 4 years.

    I appreciate that but listen to yourself: illegal population? That is ridiculous. Think about it: 1) there hasn't been a census count since years before Biden opened the border 2) even if we did a census count yesterday, how many people are going to report it on paper that they are illegal immigrants? 3) there's no way to accurately measure the number of illegal immigrants.

    Q: Is Kamala a Democrat, like Joe?
    A: Yes.

    Do you also have two arms and two legs, just like Joe?

    Certainly that's a source of unending consternation.

    This means: Joe wants the border open, he has the same handlers as Kamala, so therefore Kamala wants the border open too.

    Q: Does Trump control congress?
    A: No.

    Interestingly enough, he did have enough pull to get congress to vote
    down an immigration bill that both sides liked, seemingly because he needed the immigration platform for his campaign. So maybe that's not as true as we'd like.

    Mike tried to make that same argument but I guess I'll have to say this: it's been debunked. Ex presidents don't control anything. Trump doesn't control congress. He doesn't have "pull." If ex presidents controlled congress, which they don't, then what would the purpose of having a congress be?

    Q: If Trump IS controlling congress, what are Democrats doing about i A: Nothing.

    On THIS point, I'm in 100% agreement. Democrats have done embarrassingly little to solve much of anything in quite a while.

    It's not just Democrats, there are no useful Republicans either. Not in congress at least.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Randall Schad on Tue Oct 1 06:23:42 2024
    "At the behest of Trump.." <- That doesn't mean anything to me. Is th any video evidence? The article doesn't say "Trump was in the room" o "Trump gave a big thumbs-down to house members."

    Trump, at the time, was very vocal about taking credit for the bill failing. I do recall reading an article then where it named specific people and phone calls made, but my Google-fu is weak today.

    Did the article say what was said in the phone calls?

    Which congress members allowed Trump to control their votes?

    What would have happened to them if they didn't follow Trump's orders?

    Were they going to vote in favor of the bill if it weren't for Trump?

    What did their constituents have to say about the bill?

    It's hard to remember all that stuff, but it's easier to remember a narrative about Trump killing the bill as a campaign strategy. (Trying to help you!)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Tue Oct 1 11:36:00 2024
    Him bad mouthing and suggesting the GOP vote against the bill was all over the news. It is not my fault if you don't watch it.

    The news isn't a communications device for the president and congress. I don't
    believe that Trump forced his opinion on anybody. And if he did, then there would have to be more to that story, like what violent thing did he threaten t
    do to Mike Johnson if the legislation had passed? "You better listen to me boy." lol

    When you have supporters like Trump does, you don't have to mention
    violence. All you have to do is label Johnson a RINO for leading a vote
    for something you don't like, and then let your supporters figure out what to do about it.

    The more liberal posters here used to claim this or that word or phrase was
    a "dog whistle." While I disagreed with most of what they said, and
    disagreed that only Trump uses them, the term "RINO" is most definately one.

    It didn't legitimize illegal crossings. It allowed for a cap on crossings at legal border crossings. The bill would have been a lot better than what we have now and didn't do anything to stop Republicans from passing something even more strict once Trump got into office.

    The way I remember reading it was "a cap on ILLEGAL border crossings."

    How do you cap illegal crossings when they don't even seem to know how,
    where, or how many are crossing?

    Seeing how liberal Democrats voted against it because it was "too strict"
    tells me it was not a bad bill.

    Not bad for us but bad for them, and that's ultimately bad for us too because we need a few of their votes.

    I suspect these are the more leftist Democrats who would never vote with Republicans.

    OTOH, If you are worried about needing Democrat votes, it might be
    a *really good* idea to keep your promise and vote with them on an
    *bipartisan* immigration bill that you said you would.

    Since February, when the bill was killed, every single illegal that has got into the country is equally on the heads of Trump, Johnson, and all of their cronnies as is is on the head of Biden. It stopped being the "Biden border crisis" at that point.

    I just don't see the Trump pressure.

    They promised to vote for it. Trump got on social media and said it
    was a bad bill and they should not do it. They got scared and didn't vote for it.


    * SLMR 2.1a * "Ummm, trouble with grammar have I? Yes!" --Yoda
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to RANDALL SCHAD on Tue Oct 1 11:38:00 2024
    I do remember a lot of non-supporters blaming Cheney for things that happened while Bush was President, and IIRC Gore also tried taking credit
    for some things that happened while Clinton was President.

    To a far lesser degree, I agree. I think my original statement (or intent, at least) was to say that I've never seen it this pronounced.

    I would agree to that. I don't remember if it was quite this pronounced
    when Gore ran, but I don't think it was as there were some things (like
    Bill's daliances) that Gore wanted to distance himself from.

    Harris has most certainly been trying to take credit for things she thinks are good, while distancing herself from things she thinks have not turned out good, that resulted from Biden's Presidency.

    I admittedly have not been paying very close attention to her campaign, so I don't recall what those wins are that she's sharing credit for. (That's also partly because I don't think the administration really had any big wins in the
    first place.)

    I don't believe they've had too many, either.

    If you accept credit, even if it is something you didn't really accomplish yourself, you open yourself up for blame, too.

    Very fair assessment. After this conversation, I'll definitely be paying more attention to things like that.

    I do agree that some things are probably being blamed on her that she had nothing to do with (like claims that she has made decisions to get us involved with Ukraine), but I also believe she/her supporters are taking/giving
    credit for things that she also had little or nothing to do with.


    * SLMR 2.1a * If all appears to go well, you missed something...
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to RANDALL SCHAD on Tue Oct 1 10:58:00 2024
    Q: Does Trump control congress?
    A: No.

    Interestingly enough, he did have enough pull to get congress to vote down an immigration bill that both sides liked, seemingly because he needed the immigration platform for his campaign. So maybe that's not as true as we'd like.

    Something easily verifiable and yet will be denied by the ardent supporters.

    Q: If Trump IS controlling congress, what are Democrats doing about it? A: Nothing.

    On THIS point, I'm in 100% agreement. Democrats have done embarrassingly littl
    to solve much of anything in quite a while.

    +1.

    Again, not defending Harris. I'm saying on a lot of this stuff, there's nothin
    to defend. The primary role of the VP is not to pass legislation.

    One place where the VP does have responsibility and that could be used
    against them is in instances where they cast the Senate tie-breaker vote. I
    am not aware of what, if any, bills that VP Harris has voted on.


    * SLMR 2.1a * You're so vain / I bet you think this tagline's about you
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Tue Oct 1 11:41:00 2024
    Interestingly enough, he did have enough pull to get congress to vote down an immigration bill that both sides liked, seemingly because he needed the immigration platform for his campaign. So maybe that's not as true as we'd like.

    Mike tried to make that same argument but I guess I'll have to say this: it's been debunked.

    No it hasn't. I have provided links to where he persuaded Congressional Republicans to change their minds and kill the bill. I have seen no
    links where a *legit*, non-social-media-talking-head, news source has provided information that he did not do so.

    Not only that, but Trump *himself* repeatedly took credit for getting the
    bill killed. If you are correct and he had nothing to do with it, then he
    is a liar!

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-takes-credit-at-rally-for-killing-
    bipartisan-border-crackdown-bill-then-rails-about-border/ar-BB1hmzN0

    "A pleased Donald Trump at a Las Vega campaign rally Saturday took credit for arm-twisting behind the scenes to convince Republicans to kill the bipartisan federal bill to crack down on border security.

    "[...] It's a tactic that has sparked harsh criticism, even from Republicans.

    "Trump provided no reason for opposing the 'monstrosity' of a bill in his Nevada speech.

    "'I'll fight it all the way ... please blame it on me'"

    Trump Brags He Delivered the Death Knell to Bipartisan Bill https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-brags-he-delivered-the-death-knell
    -to-bipartisan-bill-it-s-dead/ar-BB1i3NhV

    Trump brags about efforts to stymie border talks: "Please blame it on me" https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/01/27/trump-border-biden/

    GOP senators seethe as Trump blows up delicate immigration compromise https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/25/politics/gop-senators-angry-trump-immigration- deal/index.html

    "In recent weeks, Trump has been lobbying Republicans both in private conversations and in public statements on social media to oppose the border compromise being delicately hashed out in the Senate..."

    Ex presidents don't control anything. Trump doesn't control
    congress. He doesn't have "pull." If ex presidents controlled congress, which they don't, then what would the purpose of having a congress be?

    He should not have, correct, but he does. All he has to do to ruin most Republican's future election chances, or worse, is to label them as "RINO" and his followers will take care of the rest.

    Aside from *maybe* Obama, I have never witnessed a former President, or
    anyone who is running for President, attempt to interfere with the current government like Trump has.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Boss spelled backwards is "double SOB".
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Randall Schad@1:226/44 to Aaron Thomas on Tue Oct 1 14:40:40 2024
    I'm talking about undocumented migrants; people without background
    checks. Not "immigrants." I don't know where the numbers come from
    either, but they are often reported by the media and they range from 7
    to 20 million, while Trump has suggested that Biden may have let in
    closer to 40 million undocumented migrants.

    That begs the question, then: if nobody can provide valid data, how can we attribute anything to anyone? Either we're back to just making things up (which isn't above anyone, especially lately), or someone, somewhere, is gathering data and extrapolating numbers based on a combination of historical context, statistical processes, and a light dusting of conjecture.

    Also, this isn't about an "immigrant population," this is about the
    number of foreigners who entered the USA without a visa while Biden was president.

    "Illegal immigrants" equals "undocumented migrants." We used to call them "illegal aliens." Same people, different name.

    I appreciate that but listen to yourself: illegal population? That is ridiculous. Think about it: 1) there hasn't been a census count since years before Biden opened the border 2) even if we did a census count yesterday, how many people are going to report it on paper that they are illegal immigrants? 3) there's no way to accurately measure the number
    of illegal immigrants.

    Okay, I'm listening to myself. My self says that there is a valid, rough approximation of the entire population of the country, including people who aren't here legally. My self also says that political statements that include numbers meant to incite fear and anger are grossly inaccurate.

    The latest DHS report that I could quickly pull up lists "unauthorized immigrant population" (which, again, are the people we're both talking about) from 2018 to 2022.

    That report also lists an approximate number of 11 million in 2022, with an annual entry estimate of just over 2 million. They do list the methodology for coming to those figures if you're interested.

    My SyncTerm paste function isn't working (running the latest RC version), so I can't paste the direct link, but the report is available on the dhs.gov website.

    All that aside, if, by your statement, we can't accurately measure it, how can anyone blame the current administration for not improving it?

    This means: Joe wants the border open, he has the same handlers as
    Kamala, so therefore Kamala wants the border open too.

    Q: Does Trump control congress?
    A: No.

    Interestingly enough, he did have enough pull to get congress to vote down an immigration bill that both sides liked, seemingly because he needed the immigration platform for his campaign. So maybe that's not true as we'd like.

    Mike tried to make that same argument but I guess I'll have to say this: it's been debunked. Ex presidents don't control anything. Trump doesn't control congress. He doesn't have "pull." If ex presidents controlled congress, which they don't, then what would the purpose of having a congress be?

    I did address this in another post. At some point I would really like to find the article that quoted someone as receiving a phone call from Trump where he "asked" the congressman to shoot down the bill.

    Q: If Trump IS controlling congress, what are Democrats doing ab A: Nothing.

    On THIS point, I'm in 100% agreement. Democrats have done embarrassin little to solve much of anything in quite a while.

    It's not just Democrats, there are no useful Republicans either. Not in congress at least.

    This actually sparked a thought... If I set aside a little time later this week, I might pour a glass or two of scotch and see if I can compile a short list of passed legislation that actually solved a problem anyone cares about.

    I'm certain that's going to be a short list. :)

    RS

    ... Avoid arguments about the toilet seat... Use the sink.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Arena BBS ú netasylum.com:2323 (1:226/44)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to Aaron Thomas on Tue Oct 1 20:47:46 2024
    Hello Aaron,

    I do it every day, sometimes twice a day.

    All the prayers in the world will come to naught as the
    American people have the last and final say.

    Maybe some people need 4 more years of destruction. Maybe the Democrats are
    doing that good of a job hiding everything from them.

    Are you willing to die for Trump? One person in Butler, Pennsylvania
    did. And I am *not* talking about the bonafide nutcase who took out a
    piece of Trump's ear.

    When Trump went down from the assassin's bullets on July 13, 2024,
    he kept asking about his shoes. Why? Because his shoes had suddenly
    come off his feet. And he did not know why.

    And then one of the Secret Service agents came to his rescue,
    reminding him who he was and his reasons as to why he was there.

    You see, this was a renewal of Moses being called at the Burning
    Bush on Mt. Sinai, in Exodus 3:5. I'll let you and Bj”rn read the
    passage so y'all will know what I am talking about. Anyway, this
    is when Moses goes down before the Lord, and the Lord says, "Take
    off your shoes, for the place you are on is holy ground."

    IOW, prophetic voices are saying that God made that place in
    Butler PA into holy ground for the purposes of His holy work.

    Now who is that poor soul who lost his life on Trump's account?
    And who are the kids he left behind? And also his wife who is now
    a widow?

    For Life,
    Lee

    --
    Biden 2024 - Finisth The Job

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)
  • From Randall Schad@1:226/44 to Aaron Thomas on Tue Oct 1 14:56:28 2024
    On 01 Oct 2024, Aaron Thomas said the following...

    It's hard to remember all that stuff, but it's easier to remember a narrative about Trump killing the bill as a campaign strategy. (Trying
    to help you!)

    I'm not convinced your primary motivation is in being helpful. :)

    The core of the issue on my side is that I don't think immigration is a problem in the first place. Not for Obama, nor for Trump, nor for Biden. It's a completely fabricated issue, and I didn't place much importance on committing the specifics of that to memory.

    Here's my direct question to you: if I go to the trouble of locating the article (which I'm quite sure I read), and it says that Trump asked any congressional member directly to kill the bill, will you then concede that Trump holds some influential control over congress?

    My interpretation of your prior statements leads me to think the answer to that question is "no," which tells me I should spend my time doing something more enjoyable than scouring the internet for an article I really don't care about.

    RS

    PS: I care less about narratives. Especially the immigration one in the first place.

    ... I wasn't lying... I was just writing fiction with my mouth.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Arena BBS ú netasylum.com:2323 (1:226/44)
  • From Randall Schad@1:226/44 to Mike Powell on Tue Oct 1 15:06:35 2024
    Again, not defending Harris. I'm saying on a lot of this stuff, there's nothing to defend. The primary role of the VP is not to pass legislation.

    One place where the VP does have responsibility and that could be used against them is in instances where they cast the Senate tie-breaker
    vote. I am not aware of what, if any, bills that VP Harris has voted on.

    Wife and I were just discussing this bit a couple days ago. Neither of us could think of anything she cast the tie-breaker vote on. (She's an ardent Democrat, so if there were something, I'm certain she'd be pounding her chest with it.) :)

    RS

    ... I can't decide which pants to wear... smarty or fancy?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Arena BBS ú netasylum.com:2323 (1:226/44)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Randall Schad on Tue Oct 1 13:45:12 2024
    That begs the question, then: if nobody can provide valid data, how can
    we attribute anything to anyone? Either we're back to just making things up (which isn't above anyone, especially lately), or someone, somewhere, is gathering data and extrapolating numbers based on a combination of historical context, statistical processes, and a light dusting of conjecture.

    We can't take anyone's word for it that there are illegals lurking around, but just look at the clear evidence. For example, police recently arrested an illegal in my county who was wanted for 29 murders in Peru. I can't confirm that he really is an illegal immigrant, I can't confirm that he killed anybody in Peru, but the fact that a story about an illegal immigrant fugitive being found in my county ALMOST serves as proof that we really do have some illegals roaming around, and it ALMOST serves as proof that some of them are foreign fugitives.

    Okay, I'm listening to myself. My self says that there is a valid, rough approximation of the entire population of the country, including people who aren't here legally. My self also says that political statements
    that include numbers meant to incite fear and anger are grossly inaccurate.

    I don't trust anyone's statistics or their news reports. I just lean one way or another when I start to see correlations.

    And you're right about the media lying.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Randall Schad on Tue Oct 1 13:53:52 2024
    I accidentally saved the message but there was more to the conversation:

    The latest DHS report that I could quickly pull up lists "unauthorized immigrant population" (which, again, are the people we're both talking about) from 2018 to 2022.

    That report also lists an approximate number of 11 million in 2022, with an annual entry estimate of just over 2 million. They do list the methodology for coming to those figures if you're interested.

    What's more important is how to deport them all.

    All that aside, if, by your statement, we can't accurately measure it,
    how can anyone blame the current administration for not improving it?

    There's correlating news stories, arrest records, and Biden border order reversals that prove with 99% certainty that there's an unprecedented border invasion in progress. If Trump was keeping them out, then the order reversals is what's bringing them in.

    I did address this in another post. At some point I would really like to find the article that quoted someone as receiving a phone call from
    Trump where he "asked" the congressman to shoot down the bill.

    An article can't prove what's being alleged. Unless it has text message death threats from Trump to the house GOP.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Lee Lofaso on Tue Oct 1 14:03:30 2024
    Are you willing to die for Trump? One person in Butler, Pennsylvania
    did. And I am *not* talking about the bonafide nutcase who took out a piece of Trump's ear.

    He didn't die for Trump. He died because of Democrat rhetoric.

    You see, this was a renewal of Moses being called at the Burning
    Bush on Mt. Sinai, in Exodus 3:5. I'll let you and Bj”rn read the
    passage so y'all will know what I am talking about. Anyway, this
    is when Moses goes down before the Lord, and the Lord says, "Take
    off your shoes, for the place you are on is holy ground."

    I'm glad you agree with me about Trump being chosen by God.

    Now who is that poor soul who lost his life on Trump's account?
    And who are the kids he left behind? And also his wife who is now
    a widow?

    If Democrats weren't such a big, big, big failure, then the shooting victim wouldn't have been at the Trump rally. Nobody would care who who's president.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Randall Schad on Tue Oct 1 14:29:20 2024
    The core of the issue on my side is that I don't think immigration is a problem in the first place. Not for Obama, nor for Trump, nor for Biden. It's a completely fabricated issue, and I didn't place much importance
    on committing the specifics of that to memory.

    Here's my direct question to you: if I go to the trouble of locating the article (which I'm quite sure I read), and it says that Trump asked any congressional member directly to kill the bill, will you then concede
    that Trump holds some influential control over congress?

    Articles can't prove anything, other than the fact that the article exists. I need to see Trump doing it in the act, on videotape, or on audio recording, or email or fax or text message.

    My interpretation of your prior statements leads me to think the answer
    to that question is "no," which tells me I should spend my time doing something more enjoyable than scouring the internet for an article I really don't care about.

    Articles are a waste of time. BTW: Are you related to any Schads in New York State? I am close friends with several members of the Schad family from the Binghamton area.

    PS: I care less about narratives. Especially the immigration one in the first place.

    We're all being fed narratives, and they're tricking some of us into conflating narratives with facts.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Randall Schad@1:226/44 to Aaron Thomas on Tue Oct 1 19:45:47 2024
    On 01 Oct 2024, Aaron Thomas said the following...

    That begs the question, then: if nobody can provide valid data, how c we attribute anything to anyone? Either we're back to just making thi
    [...]
    historical context, statistical processes, and a light dusting of conjecture.

    We can't take anyone's word for it that there are illegals lurking
    around, but just look at the clear evidence. For example, police
    recently arrested an illegal in my county who was wanted for 29 murders
    in Peru. I can't confirm that he really is an illegal immigrant, I can't confirm that he killed anybody in Peru, but the fact that a story about
    an illegal immigrant fugitive being found in my county ALMOST serves as proof that we really do have some illegals roaming around, and it ALMOST serves as proof that some of them are foreign fugitives.

    I don't trust anyone's statistics or their news reports. I just lean one way or another when I start to see correlations.

    I can't tell at this point if you're being sardonic or serious, and I'd rather not have to spend energy working that out.

    RS

    ... People say I act like I don't care. It's not an act.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Arena BBS ú netasylum.com:2323 (1:226/44)
  • From Randall Schad@1:226/44 to Aaron Thomas on Tue Oct 1 19:55:13 2024
    What's more important is how to deport them all.

    If Trump had built the fantastic wall he promised when he was Grand Poobah, you wouldn't have to worry about deportation now.

    It's his manufactured crisis to begin with.

    Either we are big, bad, strong, amazing Americans who can use our #1 World's Greatest Dad-Country T-shirt powers to take care of these pesky illegals, or we're super weak, helpless, defenseless babies who are so scared of the incredibly dangerous, murderous stranger-folk that we have to declare it a national emergency and have Mr. Government Man protect us.

    The messaging is ridiculous.

    RS

    ... I wasn't lying... I was just writing fiction with my mouth.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Arena BBS ú netasylum.com:2323 (1:226/44)
  • From Dr. What@1:342/201 to Aaron Thomas on Wed Oct 2 05:16:48 2024
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Randall Schad <=-

    It's hard to remember all that stuff, but it's easier to remember a narrative about Trump killing the bill as a campaign strategy. (Trying
    to help you!)

    And one of the big fallacies that the Ignorant Elitists here have is a belief that we are just as much mindless drones as they are.

    They cannot understand the concept of thinking for yourself - mostly because they are completely unable to do it.


    ... Hey Santa, can I have a copy of your naughty girls list?
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Randall Schad on Wed Oct 2 05:26:42 2024
    That begs the question, then: if nobody can provide valid data, we attribute anything to anyone? Either we're back to just makin
    [...]
    historical context, statistical processes, and a light dusting o conjecture.

    We can't take anyone's word for it that there are illegals lurking around, but just look at the clear evidence. For example, police recently arrested an illegal in my county who was wanted for 29 murde in Peru. I can't confirm that he really is an illegal immigrant, I ca confirm that he killed anybody in Peru, but the fact that a story abo an illegal immigrant fugitive being found in my county ALMOST serves proof that we really do have some illegals roaming around, and it ALM serves as proof that some of them are foreign fugitives.

    I don't trust anyone's statistics or their news reports. I just lean way or another when I start to see correlations.

    I can't tell at this point if you're being sardonic or serious, and I'd rather not have to spend energy working that out.

    I'm being serious. Not everyone trusts the media. It's a big mistake.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Wed Oct 2 08:36:00 2024
    I did address this in another post. At some point I would really like to find the article that quoted someone as receiving a phone call from Trump where he "asked" the congressman to shoot down the bill.

    An article can't prove what's being alleged. Unless it has text message death threats from Trump to the house GOP.

    When Trump brags about being responsbile at a rally, that is proof enough
    for me. Certainly, our rock who is chosen by God wouldn't lie to us!


    * SLMR 2.1a * I idiot-proof my programs, but along comes a bigger idiot
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Wed Oct 2 09:56:26 2024
    An article can't prove what's being alleged. Unless it has text message threats from Trump to the house GOP.

    When Trump brags about being responsbile at a rally, that is proof enough for me. Certainly, our rock who is chosen by God wouldn't lie to us!

    Oh! I didn't know it was at a Trump rally. But Trump is allowed to talk to members of congress. Where is the proof that Trump demanded congress members to vote nay on the bill? Did he threaten them with violence or did he threaten to ruin their career?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Thu Oct 3 07:30:15 2024
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-

    Oh! I didn't know it was at a Trump rally. But Trump is allowed to talk
    to members of congress. Where is the proof that Trump demanded congress members to vote nay on the bill? Did he threaten them with violence or
    did he threaten to ruin their career?

    That's what the Democrats do.

    But this whole "it's Trump's fault!" is just another page from the Elitist Playbook: All our failures are someone else's fault.


    ... Professionals built the Titanic, amateurs built the ark.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to Aaron Thomas on Thu Oct 3 16:56:23 2024
    Hello Aaron,

    [..]

    That report also lists an approximate number of 11 million in 2022,
    with an annual entry estimate of just over 2 million. They do list
    the methodology for coming to those figures if you're interested.

    What's more important is how to deport them all.

    Oh goodie! We get to be just like Nazi Germany in the good ol' days!
    Sure, FDR rounded up Japanese and Japanese Americans during WWII, but
    we can do better! Deport them all! From wherever they come from! Not
    just from Japan, but also from Mexico! And China! And Iran! And North
    Korea! And from Canada! And from every creek and cranny they try to
    hide themselves! Deportation camps for everybody! And if we make a
    few mistakes along the way, so what? Those who get deported do not
    belong here anyyway ...

    For Life,
    Lee

    --
    Biden 2024 - Finisth The Job

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to Aaron Thomas on Thu Oct 3 16:56:30 2024
    Hello Aaron,

    Are you willing to die for Trump? One person in Butler, Pennsylvania
    did. And I am *not* talking about the bonafide nutcase who took out a
    piece of Trump's ear.

    He didn't die for Trump.

    Yes, he did. Trump said it himself, calling it "Divine intervention."

    He died because of Democrat rhetoric.

    The term "Divine Intervention" means somebody had to die for Trump.
    Had nobody been stricken dead, Trump would no longer be with us.
    So a good man had to die, leaving behind a wife and two daughters,
    for you to get your jollies watching an orange clown on stage.

    You see, this was a renewal of Moses being called at the Burning
    Bush on Mt. Sinai, in Exodus 3:5. I'll let you and Bj”rn read the
    passage so y'all will know what I am talking about. Anyway, this
    is when Moses goes down before the Lord, and the Lord says, "Take
    off your shoes, for the place you are on is holy ground."

    I'm glad you agree with me about Trump being chosen by God.

    And then God showed him what a fool he was to believe a burning
    bush could talk. I'll let you read the rest of the story so as not
    to spoil all your fun.

    Now who is that poor soul who lost his life on Trump's account?
    And who are the kids he left behind? And also his wife who is now
    a widow?

    If Democrats weren't such a big, big, big failure, then the shooting victim
    wouldn't have been at the Trump rally.

    Earth calling Aaron. Earth calling Aaron. Trump did not blame
    Democrats or Republicans or even Reptilians for what happenened.
    He called it "Divine Intervention" - thus making God a killer.

    Nobody would care who who's president.

    God is a cold-blooded killer, so you gotta believe. Or else.
    Is that the Trump mantra?

    Good thing his Holy Zapper does not work on me ...

    For Life,
    Lee

    --
    You can tell Monopoly is an old game because there's a luxury tax and rich people can go to jail.

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Thu Oct 3 09:51:00 2024
    An article can't prove what's being alleged. Unless it has text message
    threats from Trump to the house GOP.

    When Trump brags about being responsbile at a rally, that is proof enough
    for me. Certainly, our rock who is chosen by God wouldn't lie to us!

    Oh! I didn't know it was at a Trump rally. But Trump is allowed to talk to members of congress. Where is the proof that Trump demanded congress members t
    vote nay on the bill? Did he threaten them with violence or did he threaten to
    ruin their career?

    Trump bragged at a rally that he was the one responsible for killing the
    bill. I posted links to that the other day.

    Still sounds like you are calling Trump a liar.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Repartee: An insult wearing a suit and tie.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Lee Lofaso on Thu Oct 3 10:00:30 2024
    He didn't die for Trump.

    Yes, he did. Trump said it himself, calling it "Divine intervention."

    It's not Trump's choice to make.

    The term "Divine Intervention" means somebody had to die for Trump.
    Had nobody been stricken dead, Trump would no longer be with us.
    So a good man had to die, leaving behind a wife and two daughters,
    for you to get your jollies watching an orange clown on stage.

    Is this going to stop you from going to concerts?

    Earth calling Aaron. Earth calling Aaron. Trump did not blame
    Democrats or Republicans or even Reptilians for what happenened.
    He called it "Divine Intervention" - thus making God a killer.

    I get what you're saying now. Trump says God saved him, but under that logic, God didn't save the other man. However, that other man is a hero who saved
    his family and Trump, and he's also a hero for attending Trump rallies.

    God is a cold-blooded killer, so you gotta believe. Or else.
    Is that the Trump mantra?

    But I don't think you understand that the awaken don't adhere strictly to anyone's guidelines. We love Trump, but we'll disagree with him on certain things.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Thu Oct 3 10:43:30 2024
    When Trump brags about being responsbile at a rally, that is proof enough
    for me. Certainly, our rock who is chosen by God wouldn't lie to u

    Oh! I didn't know it was at a Trump rally. But Trump is allowed to talk members of congress. Where is the proof that Trump demanded congress mem t
    vote nay on the bill? Did he threaten them with violence or did he threa to
    ruin their career?

    Trump bragged at a rally that he was the one responsible for killing the bill. I posted links to that the other day.

    Still sounds like you are calling Trump a liar.

    He can take the credit for it all he wants, but it's the house members who made a mistake if they chose allegiance to Trump over their constituents.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to Aaron Thomas on Sat Oct 5 00:02:48 2024
    Hello Aaron,

    He didn't die for Trump.

    Yes, he did. Trump said it himself, calling it "Divine LL>intervention."

    It's not Trump's choice to make.

    Trump said it. His words, not mine. He asked for it, he got it.

    The term "Divine Intervention" means somebody had to die for Trump.
    Had nobody been stricken dead, Trump would no longer be with us.
    So a good man had to die, leaving behind a wife and two daughters,
    for you to get your jollies watching an orange clown on stage.

    Is this going to stop you from going to concerts?

    Nobody deserves a bullet to the head. But that is what happened
    to one poor soul who attended a Trump concert in Butler, PA.

    Earth calling Aaron. Earth calling Aaron. Trump did not blame
    Democrats or Republicans or even Reptilians for what happenened.
    He called it "Divine Intervention" - thus making God a killer.

    I get what you're saying now. Trump says God saved him, but under that logic, God didn't save the other man. However, that other man is a hero who
    saved
    his family and Trump, and he's also a hero for attending Trump rallies.

    God killed an innocent person because Trump asked him to.
    Is that the kind of God you want to worship? A cold-blooded
    murderer? That is almost as bad as worshipping the Devil
    himself.

    God is a cold-blooded killer, so you gotta believe. Or else.
    Is that the Trump mantra?

    But I don't think you understand that the awaken don't adhere strictly to anyone's guidelines.

    A God that has no guidelines as to what to believe? My, my.
    That's a new one. Tell me, please, what exactly does Trump believe
    in? A God that let's you do whatever you want? With no concept of
    good or wrong?

    This Anything_Goes God. Where can I find Him/Her/It? Does such
    a God even exist? Please tell ...

    We love Trump, but we'll disagree with him on certain things.

    Trump is your Anything_Goes God? Oh, my ...

    For Life,
    Lee

    --
    The first thing a cult does is claim that everyone else is lying to you.

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Lee Lofaso on Fri Oct 4 20:01:58 2024
    But I don't think you understand that the awaken don't adhere strictl anyone's guidelines.

    A God that has no guidelines as to what to believe? My, my.
    That's a new one. Tell me, please, what exactly does Trump believe
    in? A God that let's you do whatever you want? With no concept of
    good or wrong?

    I'm not God, I'm just a fan. And I don't know what Trump's spiritual beliefs are because that's an unhealthy curiosity. You should pay less attention to celebrities because they try to push us away from God and we can't let that happen.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)