Well how many children were in those 14 thousand killed in Donbass by Ukrainian troops? Thousands probably.
Well how many children were in those 14 thousand killed in Donbass by
Ukrainian troops? Thousands probably.
WOW! Do you really believe that?
logical continuation of the war started in 2014. The main blame should
be put on those who didn't want to make peace for these 8 years. They
What has changed? Well, for 8 years has suffered those who lived in Donbass. Now many Ukrainians themselves feel the same horror. Probably
it makes to understand what horror they did in Donbass.
So why you don't
believe that a good part of these victims were children?
So why you don't
believe that a good part of these victims were children?
I don't believe that Ukrainians would shell their own citizens. Has the Ministry of Truth in Kremlin told you who provided those alleged shelling weapons to the Ukrainian military. eBay perhaps? Or maybe it is all a DumbAss News hoax?
Russia? It was our project, we've sent military aid and people
there. DNR/LNR were puppet states.
Ukraine authority has told many times that the autonomy of Donbass and
amnesty for rebels will never be despite these things are in the
Minsk agreements. That's why the conflict has lasted so long.
So Russian cities should be bombed because our participation in
war in Syria? Ukraine had military conflict with Russia as one
of the players on it's territory.
You should understand a simple thing, that there are countries which
can be bombed -- like Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan etc, but there are
countries which cannot be bombed because of their nuclear umbrella.
And in making your offensive policy you need be cautious in relations
with the later. It is natural as human relations. If you see a strong
man you will be polite with him. Correct? ;)
Without Russian's military help the whole DNR/LNR project was
nothing.
Ukraine is doomed as a whole country if Ukrainan nationalists continue
their aggressive ukrainization.
What, exactly, are we talking about in Russia's war with the West? Where is the neutral, unbiased coverage of the conflict? Or have you not known what was going on since 2004?
Well, 140 nations in the UN essentially decided that
You know very little of the history of Nazism (in Germany in the 1940s). The Jewish clown Zelensky is the embodiment of the rainbow dreams of the organizers of the Nazi movement.
The UN has "solved", condemned and banned many things, such as the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. How was it solved, do you know? Reservations with a 10-meter wall, barbed wire and machine gunners on towers. That was no solution - they took away the fertile land and spit on the 140 nations from a high bell tower.
You know very little of the history of Nazism (in Germany in the 1940s). The Jewish clown Zelensky is the embodiment of the rainbow dreams of the organizers of the Nazi movement.
Ukraine was so eager to get into Europe. Dreams are coming true! Romania, the Czech Republic and Poland are already beginning to realize who they have accepted. Wait a little while - all the secret becomes clear, you will know the true face of Western propaganda in Ukraine.
The Western world has never turned its face toward us. It is a mask of hypocrisy. As the master ordered, so you will turn. And bow low for the removal of the mask!
My advice - think about what you plan to achieve with sanctions? We have been living with sanctions for at least 70 years. And we can already see the benefits of them - there is no more export of capital from the country, capital works in Russia. There are no draconian restrictions on the sale of domestic medicines and products to the population. And finally take away McDonald's and Coca-Cola, stop feeding our children with modified GMOs!
You know very little of the history of Nazism (in Germany in the 1940s). The Jewish clown Zelensky is the embodiment of the rainbow dreams of the organizers of the Nazi movement.
The UN has never solved anything but created a "good ol' boys" club with
countries that are willing to go to war over ridiculous conflicts. When the U >invaded Iraq under George W. Bush, some countries came to our aid to support a
lie, but would the US risk going to war with Russia if Russia decides to bomb Poland, Czech Republic, or France, I doubt it. The UN and its NATO component were truly designed to piss Russia off and make a case to stave off Russian incurision into the West. Whatever. No one wants to risk anyone going nuclear.
As for airplanes - we can't refuse, if you
are not aware, there are at least three civil aviation factories in
Russia. And we did not fly them to Europe because Europe itself demanded
it - so you don't get earaches. On the third day I flew the IL-96, and traditionally I don't accept any other aircraft.
The UN has never solved anything but created a "good ol' boys"
club with countries that are willing to go to war over ridiculous conflicts. When the US invaded Iraq under George W. Bush, some
countries came to our aid to support a lie, but would the US risk
going to war with Russia if Russia decides to bomb Poland, Czech Republic, or France, I doubt it. The UN and its NATO component
were truly designed to piss Russia off and make a case to stave
off Russian incurision into the West. Whatever. No one wants to
risk anyone going nuclear.
I agree and disagree here. The idea of national socialism versus
what Hitler and Eichmann perverted it to become are two completely different ideals. Zelensky is trying to do the right thing but I
feel that he is taking the wrong approach.
Oh, without a doubt. Joining the EU and becoming "part of Europe"
will solve nothing for Ukraine. Ukraine needs to become truly independant before it starts down a sketchy path that could create
more problems for them than it is worth.
The Western world has never turned its face toward us. It is aRussia will always be the USSR in the eyes of the West. The West
mask of hypocrisy. As the master ordered, so you will turn. And
bow low for the removal of the mask!
will never look beyond a cloud of their own making through the
propaganda spewed during the Cold War and, with the population
living longer, those ideals won't die until that population
finally dies off (both those in the West and in Russia). Children
born in the 90s and 2000s+ see a different world, are more
knowledgable, and research. Until the world rids itself of the
Bidens, Putins, Trumps, etc., it will remain the "same ol' same
ol'".
I'm not saying Socialism is good nor am I saying it is bad. The
idea that your country should provide for itself, take care of
itself, and tend to its own matters, is socialism through and
through. Although Communism was a perversion of Socialism, Russia
could chart its own course and remove itself, once again, from the
world stage and become relatively self-sufficient.
Oh, and I completely agree about getting rid of McDonald's and
Coca-Cola. :)
My best to you!
You know very little of the history of Nazism (in Germany in theOh my dear ... I don't think in my Fido-years I've ever seen some
1940s). The Jewish clown Zelensky is the embodiment of the
rainbow dreams of the organizers of the Nazi movement.
make such a fool of himself in public.
Quite entertaining, keep it up.
You know very little of the history of Nazism (in Germany in theCan you explain that?
1940s). The Jewish clown Zelensky is the embodiment of the
rainbow dreams of the organizers of the Nazi movement.
Based on the fact that a grand total of 29 IL-96s were built of
all 4 variants of which only 14 survive (3 of which are in Cuba
and 3 are in government service) I expect you don't fly much. Such
a low production run in the free world is called "a failure".
There simply is no market for that airplane, too noisy and too
expensive to operate.
The Sukhoi 100 Superjet was promising, a few mishaps occured until
that fiery accident which was fully captured at Sheremetyevo
airport, that sealed the international potential of that type:
Brussels Airlines operated several of them and retired that whole
fleet because Sukhoi could not provide spare parts.
My daughter flew Aeroflot both medium-haul and long-haul and the
only airplanes she ever was on from Brussels in and out of Moscow
en route to the far east were Airbus-320 and Boeing-777.
There just is no international market for those Russian civilianDo you really think that the hypocritical face of the West under the mask of a benevolent reliable partner helped the Russian aviation industry to develop? What are you saying, for 30 years we have been told "it's the market, baby. you won't succeed anyway, believe us, we know - BUY our aircraft and no problems!
aircraft and Russian airlines will only fly them when they are
forced to by the government ... they're too expensive to purchase,
too expensive to operate, too noisy and bad customer service by
Ilyushin, Tupolev and Sukhoi.
As for being asked not to fly to European airports, that is not
entirely true to use an understatement. Your beloved IL-96 was
used for a while on the Moscow to NewYork route but had to stop at Heathrow for re-fueling because it lacked the endurance with a
decent load. That aircraft was so noisy that it was penalised
every time it departed and had to pay hefty fines up to the point
where Aeroflot aquired the Boeing-777 which flies the route
non-stop smiling and whistling just to avoid the cost.
It pays to know what you are talking about, but I think you
asserted in a very short while how propaganda can poison a
person's ability to think ...
And don't get your hopes up. You have very outdated data.
Forget the word "international" already, and we'll fly between our
peoples ourselves ;) we were able to cope with a much larger population
of the USSR.
If you exclude the human factor from the causes of plane crashes, Boeing would still be the most unreliable, and Airbus would still be the most sacrificial ;)
As far as I remember, Sukhoy was developed from scratch in no more than 5 years.
To me, Britain is also Europe. The fact that it seceded along with its island is irrelevant to the question.
My Fido-friend, there are only 14 airworthy IL-96 left out of 29
built. That's a fact ... it was a beautiful design and a
commercial disaster, nobody wanted it with Cubana the only foreign company aquiring it because the old USSR paid it for them.
In that case, move away from it, get rid of them ... send them
back to these leasing companies and fly good ol' Ruski stuff ...
The only Russian planes which are used extensively in Europe and
beyond are Antonovs .... wait, not Russian-made, that's Ukraine
...
Gosh, you're good at proving my point ...
Just for the record, Great Brittain "IS" an island.
We had military conflicts between India and Pakistan, they both
had nuclear weapons.
Happily there was a draw then. There were not reasons to use it.
We had military conflicts between India and Pakistan,
they both had nuclear weapons.
Happily there was a draw then. There were not reasons to
use it.
So you are agree that you were not right? :)
Russia has no reason to use nukes unless struck heavily. The same was
You mean - Putin? Because Russia is not Putin. And he is crazy
enough.
Yes, Putin.
| Sysop: | altere |
|---|---|
| Location: | Houston, TX |
| Users: | 69 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 12:25:28 |
| Calls: | 1,244 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 8,322 |
| Messages: | 303,516 |
